There is no love lost between Blair and May
The vitriol in the PM's attack against Mr Blair over a new Brexit referendum reveals a disdain for him and his style of politics.
If you add up the majorities won by Labour in Tony Blair's three general election victories in 1997, 2001 and 2005, the combined total comes to 410.
Theresa May's one election as Conservative leader saw the Tories fall eight seats short of a majority, having won a majority of 12 under David Cameron in 2015.
So in pure electoral terms, Tony Blair is a winner - right up there with Labour giants Clement Attlee and Harold Wilson - and Theresa May is a loser, likely to go down in history as one of the Tories' least successful leaders.
But the comparison between these two very different party leaders doesn't end there. Even his detractors admit he's a class act. Even her admirers admit she lacks charisma.
As well as being a winner, Mr Blair has always been a showman. Despite her Abba dance at the Tory conference, the same cannot be said of Mrs May.
Mr Blair is the actor-politician in the mould of his great friend Bill Clinton. She is the down-to-earth, unflashy, workaholic who famously sneered at more extrovert politicians: "Politics is not a game."
He had brilliant - although flawed - communicators like Peter Mandelson and Alastair Campbell working for him. She often struggles to communicate and has been cruelly called "the Maybot" for her wooden public performances.
For all that, Mrs May has one big advantage over Mr Blair. No matter how badly Brexit turns out, she will never become as reviled in her own party after leaving office as Mr Blair has been because of the Iraq war.
And while Donald Trump may have held her hand at the White House, it's difficult to imagine the cautious Mrs May allowing herself and the UK to be dragged into a horrendous war by the US president.
More than 120,000 people have signed the petition - have you?
The vitriol in the prime minister's statement attacking her Labour predecessor over his campaign for a "People's Vote" reveals a disdain for him and his style of politics.
She accused him of being "an insult to the office he once held and the people he once served". Strong stuff. Normally prime ministers and former PMs are polite and respectful towards each other.
Mrs May's attack also reveals how rattled she is becoming as her Brexit nightmare gets worse and worse. Ever since her clash with jean-Claude Juncker in Brussels, he has had a face like thunder.
He seemed somewhat stung by the ferocity of her attack, saying he sympathised with her heavy burden and did not disrespect her. "I understand her frustration," he said. Patronising? Perhaps.
She's the vicar's daughter who went to a state school. He's the former Durham Cathedral chorister who went on to Fettes public school in Edinburgh and later married the step-daughter of the Coronation Street legend Pat Phoenix.
In their early careers there were some similarities. Both made their name in opposition with a number of front bench posts. Both were not afraid to challenge their party to modernise.
Tony Blair's first front bench job was a junior Treasury spokesman. At the time, I wrote that he was Labour's youngest front bencher since David Owen. He didn't like that, since Dr Owen had defected to the SDP.
But then, in a key move, he became shadow employment secretary, with a brief to sort out Labour's policy on trade unions. Later he became shadow home secretary, from which he won the Labour leadership when John Smith died in 1994.
Mr Blair's best known slogan at the time - "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime" - was, according to supporters of Gordon Brown, thought up by Mr Brown, who was to be Mr Blair's friend, rival and enemy throughout his career.
If a second vote did happen, what would it look like, who could vote and what would be on the ballot?
As prime minister, Mr Blair had it easy, with the luxury of majorities of 179, 167 and 64. The likes of Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell and their left-wing comrades could rebel night after night - and frequently did - and it didn't matter.
And when 139 Labour MPs defied Mr Blair in the big vote on the Iraq war in 2003, Iain Duncan Smith marched Tory MPs into the Aye lobby with him, ensuring a comfortable victory. How Mrs May must wish Labour MPs would vote for her Brexit deal now.
She, on the other hand, had to go cap in hand to the Democratic Unionists after last year's election, handing them a £1bn "bung" to prop up her government. And she has now discovered they are unreliable partners.
Not that Tony Blair was invincible in the Commons. After the 2005 election he suffered his first Commons defeat as PM, on 90-day detention for terror suspects, with 49 Labour MPs voting against him.
At PMQs before the vote he defiantly told MPs: "Sometimes it is better to lose and do the right thing than to win and do the wrong thing." After pulling the Brexit vote last week, Theresa May clearly doesn't subscribe to the 2005 Blair doctrine.
Their personalities are very different, too. He's the extrovert who to this day boasts that a game of "keepy uppy" with Kevin Keegan when he was leader of the opposition was the best photo-opportunity he ever did. Brave, too.
How the UK can be out of the EU's single market and customs union and still maintain borders that look like they do now
Theresa May's campaigning during last year's general election was uninspiring and her robotic answers to questions, particularly "nothing has changed" and "I've been very clear..." sapped what little energy there was out of her campaign.
In many ways, Theresa May is like Gordon Brown: vicar's daughter and son of the manse; both hard-working, dedicated and driven; and, of course, both unflashy PMs following a flashy predecessor - in his case Blair and in May's, David Cameron.
This weekend has confirmed that, even as we approach the season of goodwill, there's no love lost between the vicar's daughter and the former cathedral chorister.
December 16, 2018
Sources: Sky News
ritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes. </p><p>"Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: she has the media, she has the followers, but bless her heart, she has some terrible ideas," Nix says. "Guaranteeing government jobs for some, while killing small-town jobs for others. Her green deal is a bad deal for North Carolina."</p><p>Nix concludes: "I'll stand up to socialism. Congress needs a good, strong dose of conservative, mature common sense."</p><p>More than a dozen other Republicans and several Democrats have entered the district race, with a primary set for April 30 and runoffs tentatively scheduled for July 9 if needed. The general election will either occur in July or September, depending on whether a primary runoff is necessary.</p><p>A Gallup poll released Friday shows that Ocasio-Cortez's unfavorable rating has risen by 15 points since last September, when she had yet to win the general election, increasing from 26 percent to 41 percent of the American adults polled.</p><p>However, despite the blowback from top Democrats and her own constituents, the 29-year-old freshman congresswoman has also managed to increase her favorability rating, if only by seven points. About 31 percent of surveyed people view her favorably, compared to 24 percent in September, according to Gallup.</p><p>Nearly three-quarters of Republican respondents say they view her negatively, with only 5 percent having a positive view. Among the Democrats, 56 percent of respondents had a favorable view of Ocasio-Cortez, compared to only 15 percent of the Democrats polled who don’t support her.</p><p>“Laughing at Trump, as the libs did, sure stopped him from being POTUS,” right-wing activist Mike Cernovich tweeted late last year. “Laughing at AOC, as the cons are doing now, sure is hurting her.”</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>
ritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes. </p><p>Scalia took particular issue with an idea advanced by South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg in which the Supreme Court would have 15 members, five of whom would "only be seated by unanimous agreement of the other 10," as Buttigieg told "Fox News Sunday."</p><p>"The problem with that," Scalia told "Your World with Neil Cavuto" Wednesday, "is, obviously Section 2, Article II of the Constitution makes very clear that the president has the power and authority to nominate and, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint Supreme Court justices. So, I mean, I don't know what ... these candidates are talking about, but they certainly can't have justices appoint their colleagues. So, that would require an [constitutional] amendment that I just don't think has a snowball's chance anywhere of being ratified."</p><p>Buttigieg is not the only Democratic candidate who has raised the prospect of overhauling the Supreme Court if they win the White House. Other 2020 contenders, including Sens.Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, and Kirsten Gillibrand have mused about adding seats to the court or, in Booker's case, implementing term limits on what has traditionally been a lifetime appointment.</p><p>Scalia said the proposals echo Franklin D. Roosevelt's "court-packing" scheme from the 1930s, which the 32nd president eventually abandoned.</p><p>Despite that, Scalia argued that FDR's proposal "did have an effect. It kind of intimidated a Supreme Court – or so, kind of the conventional wisdom goes – into being more amenable to what he was trying to do with the New Deal.</p><p>"So, he didn’t get more justices, but he did get a lot of what he wanted done, done," he added. "And it’s possible that the Democrats, just by raising this threat of packing the court are trying to do something similar."</p><p>The Constitution does not enshrine a set number of Supreme Court justices; that is up to Congress. The number of justices has been set at nine since 1869, but the tally has been as low and six and as high as ten.</p><p>Scalia said that the latest proposals by Democrats are the latest step in a political war over the judiciary that has lasted for nearly two decades.</p><p>"This goes back to the early 2000s when Democrats filibustered a lot of President Bush’s nominees and Republicans responded in kind by filibustering a lot of Obama’s nominees, and so the Democrats responded by ending the filibuster for lower court nominees, and then Republicans when the Democrats filibustered [Neil] Gorsuch, Republicans got rid of the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees," he said. "It goes on and on. So, if the Democrats try to do this, try to pack the court, I don’t know why they’re under the impression that the next time they have the Senate and the next time they have the president, Republicans will never be in power again because they’re on the right side of history and history will finally meet its ultimate end."</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>
ritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes. </p><p>Stone -- who was indicted last month on charges of obstruction, making false statements and witness tampering -- denied to Fox News that evidence of such communications exists.</p><p>“There is no such evidence,” Stone said in a text message.</p><p>In a Friday motion, Mueller’s team said that “search warrants were executed on accounts that contained Stone’s communications” with an organization widely believed to be WikiLeaks.</p><p>Last month’s indictment does not charge Stone with conspiring with WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy website that published the emails, or with the Russian officers Mueller says hacked them. Instead, it accuses him of witness tampering, obstruction and false statements about his interactions related to WikiLeaks' release.</p><p>The indictment says Stone spoke to Trump campaign officials during the summer of 2016 about WikiLeaks and information the organization had that might be damaging to the Clinton campaign. It also says Stone was contacted by “senior Trump campaign officials” to inquire about future WikiLeaks releases of hacked Democratic emails.</p><p>Earlier Friday, Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the federal court for the District of Columbia instituted a partial gag order, ordering that Stone “refrain from making statements to the media or in public settings that pose a substantial likelihood of material prejudice to this case.”</p><p>Jackson further ordered that any participants in the case, including witnesses and counsel, “refrain” from making any statements to the media or public when they are near the courthouse that could “influence any juror, potential juror, judge, witness or court officer or interfere with the administration of justice.”</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>
FBI scrambled to respond to Hillary Clinton lawyer amid Weiner laptop review, newly released emails show
ritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes. </p><p>South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham demands answers from FBI about heavy-handed raid on Roger Stone's home.</p><p>The FBI did not respond to Fox News' request for comment on the released emails.</p><p>On the afternoon of Oct. 28, Clinton lawyer David Kendall demanded answers from the FBI -- and the agency jumped into action, the emails showed.</p><p>New text messages between Strzok and Page were 'leaking like mad' in the lead up to the Trump-Russia probe.</p><p>Although Kendall's email was redacted, Baker continued: "He said that our letter was 'tantalizingly ambiguous' and made statements that were 'inchoate and highly ominous' such that what we had done was worse than transparency because it allows people to make whatever they want out to make out of the letter to the prejudice of Secretary Clinton. ... I told him that I could not respond to his requests at this time but that I would discuss it with others and get back to him.</p><p>"I suggest that we have some kind of follow up meeting or phone call with this group either this evening or over the weekend to address this and probably other issues/questions that come up in the next 24 hours," Baker concluded. "Sound reasonable?"</p><p>Strzok added that a team was coming in to "triple-check" his methodology and conclusions.</p><p>“It is big news that, just days before the presidential election, Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer pressured the top lawyer for the FBI on the infamous Weiner laptop emails,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “These documents further underscore that the fix was in for Hillary Clinton. When will the Justice Department and FBI finally do an honest investigation of the Clinton email scandal?”</p><p>"Jason Herring will be providing you with three 302s [witness reports] of current and former FBI employees who were interviewed during the course of the Clinton investigation," Page wrote. "These 302s are scheduled to be released to Congress in an unredacted form at the end of the week, and produced (with redactions) pursuant to FOIA at the beginning of next week.</p><p>Page continued: "As you will see, they describe a discussion about potential quid pro quo arrangement between then-DAD in IOD [deputy assistant director in International Operations Division] and an Undersecretary at the State Department whereby IOD would get more LEGAT [legal attaché] positions if the FBI could change the basis of the FOIA withhold re a Clinton email from classified to something else."</p><p>Through it all, the trove of documents suggested that top to bottom, FBI brass were convinced they were acting appropriately.</p><p>Home security footage of the FBI raiding Roger Stone's home in Florida on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'</p><p>In response to a press release from Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley that criticized the FBI for failing to release unclassified information in a timely matter to Congress, Comey quoted Emerson's 1841 essay "Self Reliance."</p><p>"Outstanding. ... I should have added that I'm proud of the way we have handled this release," Comey wrote to his subordinates, including Strzok, on Sept. 2, 2016. "Thanks for the work on it. Just another reminder that Emerson was right when he said, 'To be great is to be misunderstood.' Have a great and quiet weekend."</p><p>Page forwarded the email along to her colleagues, including Strzok, and added a smiley face.</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>
ritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes. </p><p>Congressional negotiators revealed Monday evening that they've reached "an agreement in principle" on border security funding and other issues that could avert a second partial government shutdown this year.</p><p>When asked if they had an agreement that President Trump would approve, Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, told reporters: "I think so." Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., declined to give details of the deal, but said more should be known by Wednesday. Lawmakers have until 11:59 p.m. Friday to get the agreement through both houses of Congress and signed by Trump before several Cabinet-level departments shut down and hundreds of thousands of federal workers are furloughed.</p><p>Much of the focus will surround how much money will be allotted for Trump's long-promised wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. The White House has asked for $5.7 billion for the barrier, which congressional Democrats have refused to fund. However, Democrats have agreed to at least some money for border structures and have focused on reducing funding for detention beds to curb what they see as unnecessarily harsh enforcement by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>
ritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes. </p><p>O'Rourke, meanwhile, will be protesting such a wall with his one-mile march, that will conclude with a speech critical of Trump's push for billions in federal funding for a border wall.</p><p>The continued push for funding comes days before the government funding deadline. If funding isn't approved — a battle which sparked the nation's longest government shutdown in history — the government will face a second partial shutdown on Friday.</p><p>The White House last month agreed to a temporary spending bill to end the 35-day partial shutdown, although Trump said at the time that the move was not a "concession" and that he would not relent on his demands for a wall.</p><p>Earlier Monday, negotiators in Congress announced that they had reached an agreement in principle to fund the government and avoid another partial government shutdown. The emerging agreement was announced by a group of lawmakers, including Republican Sen. Richard Shelby and Democratic Rep. Nita Lowey, after a closed-door meeting on Capitol Hill.</p><p>The talks had cratered over the weekend because of Democratic demands to limit immigrant detentions by federal authorities, but lawmakers apparently broke through that impasse Monday evening</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>
p Hammond finds "extra billions" to spend, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).</p><p>To preserve current per capita levels of spending across Whitehall departments which do not have ring-fenced budgets, the IFS estimates the chancellor would need to find an additional £5bn a year by 2023-24.</p><p>The think tank also warned that Mr Hammond would need to spend £11bn to avoid day-to-day spending falling as a share of national income.</p><p>The IFS figures follow analysis of the choices facing the chancellor in this year's spending review.</p><p>It claimed that spending increases already promised by the chancellor could be swallowed by commitments to fund the NHS, defence and international aid - potentially resulting in cuts to other departments.</p><p>According to the IFS, a no-deal Brexit would complicate its calculations as taxes would have to rise or spending would have to be cut to account for expected lower economic growth.</p><p>With that Brexit fog in mind, it suggested Mr Hammond may wish to reduce the number of years covered by the spending review - and only set out plans for the 2020-21 financial year.</p><p>The report said: "The provisional totals set out in the autumn budget imply that day-to-day public service spending will increase by 6.1% (£18.2bn) between 2018-19 and 2023-24.</p><p>"This would outstrip population growth, putting per capita spending on an upward trend.</p><p>"But this would not be enough to meet the cost of the government's existing spending commitments on the NHS, defence and overseas aid while avoiding cuts elsewhere.</p><p>"Other 'unprotected' areas are therefore, on current plans, facing further budget cuts of around 0.4% per year in real terms between 2019-20 and 2023-24, and cuts of 0.9% per year in per capita spending.</p><p>"This would slow the pace of the cuts experienced by those areas since 2010, but would by no means represent an 'end to austerity'", the study concluded.</p><p>Report author Ben Zaranko added: "The chancellor needs to decide what period the next spending review should cover and what funding to make available to it.</p><p>"This could be the most important announcement in next month's spring statement."</p><p>Shadow chancellor John McDonnell responded: "The evidence is mounting that despite Theresa May's rhetoric, austerity is not over.</p><p>"Unless Philip Hammond, at the very least, finds another £5bn at the spring statement, departments will be planning for yet more cuts next year.</p><p>"Nine years of brutal Tory austerity have wounded our public services and the whole country which relies on them.</p><p>"The Chancellor has promised a 'Brexit bonus' and any failure to deliver it at the spring statement will be yet more evidence of the Tories' failure to negotiate a Brexit deal that benefits jobs and the economy."</p>
GCSEs should be scrapped.</p><p>Robert Halfon wants to replace them with a baccalaureate, taken at 18, that offers more access to vocation-based technical and creative skills, alongside traditional academic learning.</p><p>The Conservative MP for Harlow will use a speech to education professionals at the Cabinet War Rooms in London to say England's education system needs a radical overhaul.</p><p>He is expected to say: "I fully support the need for every young person to be able to access through their schooling, a working knowledge of our cultural capital, our history and our literature.</p><p>"But it is also essential that we are developing our next generation of engineers, entrepreneurs and designers.</p><p>"All young people should have access to the technical and creative subjects that will give them the skills that employers are looking for.</p><p>"These are not 'soft skills' developed at the expense of knowledge, but the essential skills that will enable young people to interpret, manipulate and communicate that knowledge.</p><p>"We must move from knowledge-rich to knowledge-engaged."</p><p>A Department for Education spokesman defended the value of GCSEs and said so-called "T-levels" - which come in next year and are equivalent to three A-levels - would improve the technical and vocational qualifications on offer.</p><p>"GSCEs are the gold standard qualification at age 16 and a passport to further study and employability," said the spokesman.</p><p>"They were recently reformed so that their demand matches that in other high-performing countries and better prepare students for work and further study.</p><p>"We are also taking forward reforms from the Independent Panel on Technical Education to give students a clear choice between an academic or technical path at aged 16. T-levels, alongside apprenticeships, will form the basis of our high-quality technical education offer."</p>
ritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes. </p><p>The National Rifle Association and the Second Amendment Foundation have filed a lawsuit in federal court alleging the initiative is unconstitutional. They say its purchasing requirements violate the right to bear arms and stray into the regulation of interstate commerce, which is the province of the federal government.</p><p>Sheriffs in 12 mostly rural, conservative counties — Grant, Lincoln, Okanogan, Cowlitz, Douglas, Benton, Pacific, Stevens, Yakima, Wahkiakum, Mason and Klickitat — along with the police chief of the small town of Republic, have said they will not enforce the new law until the issues are decided by the courts.</p><p>“I swore an oath to defend our citizens and their constitutionally protected rights,” Grant County Sheriff Tom Jones said. “I do not believe the popular vote overrules that.”</p><p>Initiative supporters say they are disappointed but noted the sheriffs have no role in enforcing the new restrictions until July 1, when the expanded background checks take effect. The provision brings vetting for semi-automatic rifle and other gun purchases in line with the process for buying pistols.</p><p>“The political grandstanding is disheartening,” said Renee Hopkins, chief executive of the Alliance for Gun Responsibility, which pushed the initiative. “If they do not (run the background checks), we will have a huge problem.”</p><p>The Parkland shooting, which left 17 dead, fueled a shift in the country’s political landscape regarding gun control. Other state-level measures included requiring waiting periods and banning high-capacity magazines. Nine states have approved laws that allow the temporary confiscation of weapons from people deemed a safety risk, bringing the total to 14 nationwide. Several more are likely to follow in the coming months.</p><p>At the federal level, for the first time in modern history, gun-control groups outspent the NRA on the 2018 midterm elections. President Donald Trump directed the Justice Department to issue regulations to ban so-called bump stocks. And the new Democratic majority in the House last week held its first hearing on gun control in a decade.</p><p>“For far too long, Republicans in Congress have offered moments of silence instead of action in the wake of gun tragedies. That era is over,” Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York said as he convened the House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday.</p><p>Washington’s initiative targeted semi-automatic assault rifles like the AR-15 used in the Florida shooting and other recent high-profile attacks. Such rifles fire only once for each pull of the trigger but automatically eject and rechamber a new round after each shot.</p><p>Grant County’s sheriff said many residents in his part of the state, known for its vast potato farms, are strong supporters of gun rights. They “have a right to have this challenge and appeals process play out before moving forward,” Jones said.</p><p>Lincoln County Sheriff Wade Magers noted more than 75 percent of voters in his small county just west of Spokane voted against the initiative. He called the new rules unenforceable.</p><p>On the flip side, the sheriff’s offices in King County, which includes Seattle, and Clark County, near Portland, Oregon, have said they will enforce the measure while it is being challenged in court.</p><p>Carla Tolle of Kelso, in Cowlitz County, north of Portland, is an initiative supporter whose grandson was shot to death by a friend wielding a shotgun in 2017 in what was ultimately ruled an accidental shooting.</p><p>She said she was “shocked, devastated, dumbfounded” to learn Cowlitz County Sheriff Brad Thurman said he will not enforce the stricter gun rules until the legal case is resolved.</p><p>“He saw firsthand what happened with an unsecured firearm,” Tolle said. “He saw the effect on both families.”</p><p>Spokane County Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich has criticized the initiative while also decrying “grandstanding” sheriffs who decline to enforce it.</p><p>Hopkins, of the Alliance for Gun Responsibility, noted only a relatively small number of Washington’s law enforcement leaders are speaking against the measure, while many others support it.</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>
ritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes. </p><p>Warren, who officially announced her bid for the Democratic presidential nomination on Saturday, made the remark at the Veterans Memorial Building in Cedar Rapids in front of a crowd of several hundred. The Massachusetts senator argued that Democrats should resist the urge to respond to "a racist tweet, a hateful tweet, something really dark and ugly" when choosing whether or not to spar with Trump.</p><p>“By the time we get to 2020, Donald Trump may not even be president,” she continued. “In fact, he may not even be a free person.”</p><p>Warren's comments come after President Trump took a jab at her on Twitter shortly after she announced her presidential campaign.</p><p>"Today Elizabeth Warren, sometimes referred to by me as Pocahontas, joined the race for President," he tweeted. "Will she run as our first Native American presidential candidate, or has she decided that after 32 years, this is not playing so well anymore? See you on the campaign TRAIL, Liz!"</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2019 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>