Cuomo handily defeats 'resistance' challenger Cynthia Nixon, as far-left Dems fall in several key races

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.

Incumbent Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo looks to hold off a challenge from actress and progressive candidate Cynthia Nixon; Jacqui Heinrich reports.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo soundly defeated insurgent progressive Cynthia Nixon in Thursday's gubernatorial primary, denying far-left liberals a victory they had long sought against the establishment Democrat.

And Incumbent Kathy Hochul defeated Jumaane Williams, another so-called "resistance" candidate, in the race for lieutenant governor. Hochul, a former congresswoman from Buffalo, now moves on to the November general election as Cuomo's running mate.

Rounding out the day's key races, Cuomo-backed New York City Public Advocate Letitia James, 59, won a four-way Democratic primary for attorney general, triumphing over progressive law professor Zephyr Teachout. Teachout had campaigned with Nixon against Cuomo, and pledged to make fighting state corruption a priority. She said she'd use the "law as a sword, not just a shield" in cracking down on Trump. 

The losses were a one-two-three punch for so-called "resistance" Democrats seeking to defy polls -- and better-funded opponents -- to upend the New York party establishment. 

Still, there was some good news for Ocasio-Cortez supporters on the night: Julia Salazar, a democratic socialist whose campaign for a seat in the state Senate was overshadowed by a series of bizarre revelations about her past, unseated a 16-year incumbent in Thursday's Democratic primary.

The current attorney general, Barbara Underwood, was appointed in May when Eric Schneiderman resigned after he was accused of physically abusing women. Underwood declined to run for election.

The results, on the whole, were mostly expected, even if this primary season has shown that upsets are almost the new normal. Williams, the lieutenant general candidate, has reportedly faced significant financial troubles and was found guilty of obstructing an emergency vehicle after he blocked an ambulance at an immigrants' rights rally last month.

Williams was impeding an ambulance carrying his friend, an immigrant rights activist who had been informed he would be detained, and then fainted. Williams also was booked for blocking traffic outside of Trump Tower in the wake of the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Cuomo has endorsed the incumbent, Kathy Hochul, who was leading narrowly in early returns. Williams has Nixon's backing.

With 88 percent of precincts reporting, Salazar led state Sen. Martin Dilan by 58 percent to 42 percent. She will not face a Republican opponent in November.

The state's gubernatorial race commanded most of the fanfare on the evening. Nixon, a former "Sex and the City" co-star, was widely predicted to lose the race, even as she insisted polls were underestimating her support. She had sought to mirror the success of Democratic Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and capitalize on a series of missteps by Cuomo, who was roundly mocked last month for saying America "was never that great."

The race had featured bitter attacks, with Nixon calling Cuomo a "bully" and Cuomo's campaign dismissing her as "unhinged."

Both Cuomo and Nixon sought to make the election about Trump. "Together, we can show the entire country that in the era of Donald Trump, New Yorkers will come together and lead our nation forward," Nixon wrote Wednesday evening in a final message to supporters. 

Cuomo, for his part, spent millions on ads to argue that he's the most qualified candidate to push back against the White House. He also touted liberal accomplishments such as gun control, free public college tuition and a higher minimum wage.

Cuomo is set to face Republican Dutchess County Executive Marc Molinaro, Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins and former Syracuse Mayor Stephanie Miner, an independent, in the November general election. 

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.


September 14, 2018

Sources: Fox News

Related news

  • 4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault against Ford

    4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault against Ford

    or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p><p>Christine Blasey Ford has publicly accused Donald Trump&#x27;s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault decades ago. A look at what she is saying and how top lawmakers are responding.</p><p>In an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday, Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate of Ford's at the Holton-Arms all-girls school in Maryland, said she doesn’t know Kavanugh or remember being at the party with him.</p><p>“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” lawyer Howard J. Walsh III of Bethesda, Md., conveyed in an email to the committee that was obtained by Fox News.</p><p>In response, Ford’s lawyer Debra Katz said: “As Dr. Ford has said, she did not share her story publicly or with anyone for years following the incident with Judge Kavanaugh.</p><p>&quot;It's not surprising that Ms. Keyser has no recollection of the evening as they did not discuss it. It's also unremarkable that Ms. Keyser does not remember attending a specific gathering 30 years ago at which nothing of consequence happened to her. Dr. Ford of course will never forget this gathering because of what happened to her there.”</p><p>Keyser’s denial brings to four the number of witnesses, including Kavanaugh, who’ve all said they have no memory of the party or the incident.</p><p>Other denials were issued earlier this week by Mark Judge and Patrick “PJ” Smith.</p><p>Ford alleges that Kavanaugh assaulted her during a housing party in high school in the 1980s.</p><p>Ford's claims have rattled Washington and stalled Kavanaugh’s conformation process. Democrats have called for a delay on his confirmation vote to the Supreme Court pending an FBI investigation, something Republicans deem unnecessary.</p><p>The Associated Press was told Kavanaugh would also appear and other terms of the agreement were still in negotiations.&nbsp;</p><p>Multiple GOPers tell Fox they don’t think Ford is truly interested in testifying. But there is a challenge for senators of both parties: are they willing to forge ahead with a cmte vote without resolving the Ford allegation?</p><p>In a statement Saturday, White House spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said:</p><p>“One week ago, Dr. Christine Ford claimed she was assaulted at a house party attended by four others. Since then, all four of these individuals have provided statements to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of the incident or even having attended such a party.”</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>

    1 September 23, 2018
  • DHS plan would push immigrants to 'show they can support themselves,' Nielsen says

    DHS plan would push immigrants to 'show they can support themselves,' Nielsen says

    or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p><p> Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen address the National Cybersecurity Summit in New York City, July 31, 2018. &nbsp;(Associated Press) </p><p>Immigrants to the United States who are overly reliant on public assistance may soon find it more difficult to remain in the country.</p><p>&ldquo;Under long-standing federal law, those seeking to immigrate to the United States must show they can support themselves financially.&rdquo;</p><p>The proposed changes would “promote immigrant self-sufficiency and protect finite resources by ensuring that they are not likely to become burdens on American taxpayers,” Nielsen added.</p><p>President Trump has said he wants to replace the current immigration system with a merit-based one, based on job skills.</p><p>Green card applicants are already required by federal law to prove they will not be a burden – or “public charge” – but the proposal would expand the number programs that could disqualify them.</p><p>If adopted, the changes would affect those applying for immigration visas or those with temporary residency who want to stay in the country, and could affect the more than 600,000 participants in DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) -- the Obama-era &quot;Dreamers&quot; program -- if they file for permanent residency, according to the Post.</p><p>The proposal would have little effect on undocumented immigrants or foreigners who apply for “temporary protected status” to remain in the U.S. after a natural disaster or armed conflict in their home countries.</p><p>Critics see the measure as just another attempt to restrict legal immigration and force low-income families to choose between receiving public assistance or staying in the United States.</p><p>“This would force families -- including citizen children -- to choose between getting the help they need and remaining in their communities,” said Diane Yentel, president of the National Low Income Housing Coalition. “The last thing the federal government should do is punish families that have fallen on hard times for feeding their children or&nbsp;keeping a roof over their heads and avoiding homelessness.”</p><p>The Post reported that 3.7 percent of the 41.5 million immigrants living in the U.S. received cash benefits in 2013 and 22.7 percent received other forms of assistance like Medicaid, housing subsidies or home heating assistance.</p><p>The percentage of native-born Americans who get the same forms of assistance in 2015 was nearly identical.</p><p>The timing of the proposal, along with an announcement earlier this week that the administration will admit no more than 30,000 refugees in the next fiscal year, could stir up the Republican Party’s base.</p><p>“We can be choosy about who we allow into the country,” said Hans von Spakovsky, a senior fellow with the conservative Heritage Foundation. “One of the primary factors ought to be ensuring that the legal immigrants who come in are people who can financially support themselves.”</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>

    1 September 23, 2018
  • Corbyn would back Brexit vote - but prefers an election

    Corbyn would back Brexit vote - but prefers an election

    the final say on Brexit, according to the results of a new poll.</p><p>Jeremy Corbyn has said he would back a second EU referendum if Labour members demand he do so at his party conference.</p><p>Mr Corbyn believes a general election would be the best way to resolve the political crisis enveloping the negotiations, but has admitted he would be prepared to push for another public vote on Brexit.</p><p>Mr Corbyn told the Sunday Mirror: "What comes out of conference I will adhere to. But I'm not calling for a second referendum. I hope we will agree that the best way of resolving this is a general election.</p><p>"But I was elected to empower the members of the party. So if conference makes a decision I will not walk away from it and I will act accordingly."</p><p>His comments came as a poll found 86% of party members think voters should have the final say on the outcome of the negotiations, and 90% would now vote to remain in the EU.</p><p>The striking results came from a YouGov survey carried out for The Observer, which found that just 8% of Labour members are opposed to another referendum on Brexit.</p><p>Even in the North and Midlands, where many Labour constituencies voted Leave in 2016, there was overwhelming support - 86% and 88% respectively - for a second vote.</p><p>Some 81% believe their standard of living would get worse after Brexit and 89% said it would be bad for jobs.</p><p>Labour deputy leader Tom Watson - who will appear live on Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Sky News from 9am - told the newspaper: "Jeremy and I were elected in 2015 to give the Labour Party back to its members.</p><p>"So if the people's party decide they want the people to have a final say on the deal, we have to respect the view of our members and we will go out and argue for it."</p><p>The prime minister has repeatedly insisted that there will not be a second referendum and has told warring Tories that the party must "hold our nerve" and unite in the national interest to deliver Brexit.</p><p>Whether or not Mrs May will strike a deal with the EU should become clearer at a summit in Brussels next month, but she has come under increased pressure from Brexiteer MPs to "chuck Chequers" and be prepared to walk away.</p><p>Both criticised the Chequers plan put forward by Mrs May, but the prime minister has insisted it remains the only credible proposal on the table.</p><p>In a statement, Mrs May said: "Now is the time for cool heads. And it is a time to hold our nerve. I have said many times that these negotiations would be tough, and they were always bound to be toughest in the final straight.</p><p>"But what's also clear is that many in Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the SNP are trying to thwart Brexit at every step and seeking to exploit this moment for political gain.</p><p>"Some are now openly advocating a second referendum and extending article 50 to delay Brexit, sending us right back to square one. Others are talking directly to the EU to actively undermine the UK's negotiating position.</p><p>"But I say, this is the moment to put our country first. This is the moment to set aside our differences and come together in national unity. This is the moment to do what is right for Britain."</p><p>Her statement came amid reports that Downing Street was planning for a snap general election in an attempt to save the prime minister - something Number 10 has denied.</p><p>The Sunday Times claimed two senior aides were getting ready for a vote as early as November in a bid to win public support for the Chequers proposal, but a government spokesman said the report was "categorically untrue".</p><p>Sky News is campaigning for an independent commission to organise election TV debates between the UK&#x27;s main party leaders</p><p>Work and Pensions Secretary Esther McVey and International Development Secretary Penny Mordaunt are among those who could resign if no backup plan is agreed to, the newspaper said on Saturday.</p><p>Speaking to BBC Radio 4 on Saturday, the foreign secretary urged EU leaders to "step back from the abyss, to sit down and talk to us about how we can make these sensible, concrete proposals actually work".</p><p>He added: "If the EU's view is that just by saying no to every proposal made by the UK we will eventually capitulate and end up with either a Norway option or indeed staying in the EU - if that is their view then they've profoundly misjudged the British people."</p>

    1 September 23, 2018
  • Tentative agreement reached for Kavanaugh-Ford hearing on Thursday, source says

    Tentative agreement reached for Kavanaugh-Ford hearing on Thursday, source says

    or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p><p>Lawyer for Kavanaugh&#x27;s accuser provides letter to Senate Judiciary Committee&#x3b; Garrett Tenney reports.</p><p>A tentative agreement for a Thursday hearing with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford has been reached, a source with knowledge of the discussions told Fox News.</p><p>This comes as Ford earlier Saturday said she would accept the Senate Judiciary Committee’s request to discuss an alleged sexual assault by Kavanaugh, although the terms under which she might testify remained unclear as of the early evening.</p><p>In a letter to the committee, Ford’s lawyers said that she “accepts” the request to provide “her first-hand knowledge of Brett Kavanaugh’s sexual misconduct next week” after Republicans on the committee set a 2:30 p.m. deadline for her to say whether or not she would do so. Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, had said a vote would proceed in the absence of a response from Ford's team by the cutoff time.</p><p>However, it was not clear under what&nbsp; terms Ford would agree to tell her side of the story, something that has been a subject of debate between Ford's team and committee Republicans. In the letter, Ford’s lawyers said “many aspects of the proposal you provided ... are fundamentally inconsistent with the Committee’s promise of a fair, impartial investigation into her allegations” but expressed hope that an agreement would be reached.</p><p>Fox News was told that Debra Katz, one of the lawyers representing Ford, requested that a hearing be set for Thursday -- a request the Republicans on the committee had initially rejected, offering Wednesday instead.</p><p>Grassley did not immediately respond to the letter, but a senior White House official told Fox News that it represented a request to continue negotiations without any firm commitment.</p><p>“It’s a clever way to push off the vote Monday without committing to appear Wednesday,” the official said.</p><p>White House spokesperson Kerri Kupec later issued a separate statement, noting that Kavanaugh has denied the allegation &quot;and is eager to testify publicly to defend his integrity and clear his good name.&quot;</p><p>&quot;On Monday, Brett Kavanaugh met with committee counsels to answer questions subject to criminal penalties and offered to testify publicly&nbsp;Tuesday morning,&quot; the statement continued. &quot;Since then, we have heard about different dates, conditions and ever-changing schedules, but today we appear no closer to a fair hearing.</p><p>&quot;But one thing has remained consistent: Brett Kavanaugh remains ready, willing and eager to testify as soon as possible.”</p><p>Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who sits on the committee, tweeted that &quot;we are no closer to hearing from Dr. Ford than we were when her lawyers said Dr. Ford was willing to testify during their media tour 6 days ago.&quot;</p><p>Ford alleges that Kavanaugh assaulted her during a house party in high school in the 1980s. Kavanaugh has repeatedly denied the allegation. Democrats have called for the vote on his confirmation to the nation’s highest court to be delayed, pending a full FBI investigation, something that Republicans have dismissed as unnecessary.</p><p>Republicans have accused Democrats of sitting on the doctor's allegation during the hearings and looking to delay the vote until after the midterms in November. They say they have accepted a number of demands from Ford for her testimony, but rejected others, calling them &quot;unreasonable.&quot;</p><p>Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said in a statement that he will support Ford's &quot;steadfast bravery against the arbitrary, unfair, irrational constraints set by Chairman Grassley.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I remain deeply disturbed by the conduct of my colleagues over the last week, and am committed to ensuring that Dr. Ford’s safety and security is made a top priority,” he said.</p><p>Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., said Ford had demonstrated &quot;impressive courage&quot; in her willingness to come forward &quot;in spite of Republicans’ astounding disregard for basic due process in failing to order the completion of a background investigation.&quot;</p><p>“Even in accommodating Dr. Blasey Ford’s request for a few additional days, Chairman Grassley has rejected many of her reasonable requests to ensure a fair process,&quot; his statement said. &quot;Next week’s hearing, as currently contemplated, will be a kangaroo court, because the Republicans have done everything in their power to prevent the consideration of any outside evidence, whether corroborating or exculpatory. Republicans should respect Dr. Blasey Ford’s wishes, as they should respect the wishes of all victims of sexual assault.&quot;</p><p>Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., similarly commended Ford for her &quot;brave decision to testify.&quot;</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>

    1 September 23, 2018
  • Pompeo says officials not backing Trump's mission 'ought to find something else to do'

    Pompeo says officials not backing Trump's mission 'ought to find something else to do'

    or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p><p>&#x27;Fox News Sunday&#x27; anchor Chris Wallace asks Secretary of State Mike Pompeo about Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein reportedly talking about secretly recording President Trump.</p><p>Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in an interview with Fox News to air Sunday that officials not on board with helping to achieve President Trump’s mission “ought to find something else to do.”</p><p>&quot;I’m not going to comment on that in any way, other than to say this: I’ve been pretty clear since my beginning of service here in this administration, if you can’t be on the team, if you’re not supporting this mission, then maybe you ought to find something else to do,” he said.</p><p>“I’ve told that to my senior colleagues, I’ve told it to junior folks at the CIA, and the State Department; we need everyone who’s engaged in helping achieve President Trump’s mission,” he said. “And I hope that everyone in every agency: DOJ, FBI, State Department is on that mission.”</p><p>Asked if wiring the president and talking about the 25th Amendment was “not being on the team,” Pompeo said: “Not remotely.”</p><p>According to The Times, none of Rosenstein’s proposals were acted upon and it remains unclear the level of seriousness Rosenstein had when making the suggestions.</p><p>“I remember this meeting and remember the wire comment,” a source who was in the room told Fox News. “The statement was sarcastic and was never discussed with any intention of recording a conversation with the president.”</p><p>Rosenstein has adamantly denied the accusations made in the Times' story.</p><p>“The New York Times’s story is inaccurate and factually incorrect,” he said in a statement to Fox News on Friday. “I will not further comment on a story based on anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the department and are advancing their own personal agenda. But let me clear about this: Based on my personal dealings with the president, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment.”</p><p>In another statement, he said emphatically, “I never pursued or authorized recording the president, and any suggestion that I have ever advocated for the removal of the president is absolutely false.&quot;</p><p>On Saturday House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said on “Cavuto Live” that Rosenstein should resign if the allegations were true.</p><p>“If these allegations are true, they are very serious allegations and I would say, yes, Mr. Rosenstein would be well-advised to step aside, the president and the attorney general would be well within their right to terminate his employment.”</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>

    1 September 22, 2018
  •  Kavanaugh accuser given until 2:30 p.m. Saturday to decide whether to testify

    Kavanaugh accuser given until 2:30 p.m. Saturday to decide whether to testify

    e has given Christine Blasey Ford until midafternoon Saturday to respond on whether she will testify next week on her allegation of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. </p><p> The new deadline of 2:30 p.m. Saturday comes after the committee chairman, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, extended a previous deadline of 10 p.m. Friday night. </p><p> Grassley tweeted Friday night he “granted another extension” to Ford “to decide if she wants to proceed with the statement she made last week to testify to the Senate.” He was referring to Ford's account to The Washington Post on Sunday of the alleged assault by Kavanaugh when the two were teens in the Maryland suburbs in the 1980s. </p><p> The Republican committee chairman tweeted that he had granted Ford "five extensions" in setting terms for her testimony and he apologized to Kavanaugh, saying he's not normally so indecisive. </p><p> Grassley has also said that if Ford’s attorneys do not respond by the new deadline or if she refuses to testify, the committee will move ahead and vote on Kavanaugh's nomination Monday. </p><p> Ford's lawyer, Debra S. Katz, sent a letter Friday accusing Grassley of setting "aggressive and artificial deadlines" on the negotiations. </p><p> "The imposition of aggressive and artificial deadlines regarding the date and conditions of any hearing has created tremendous and unwarranted anxiety and stress on Dr. Ford," Katz wrote. "Your cavalier treatment of a sexual assault survivor who has been doing her best to cooperate with the Committee is completely inappropriate." </p><p> Katz has said her client is willing to talk to the committee if specific requirements are met. </p><p> Prior to the extension Friday, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee also questioned why Republicans could not wait another day to get a response from Ford. </p><p> “It’s clear that Republicans are doing all they can to cement another conservative seat on the Supreme Court—at any cost—even pushing through a nominee with a cloud of controversy hanging over his head,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California said. </p><p> “Brett Kavanaugh could serve on the court for 40 years, what’s another 24 hours to make sure we get this right?” she said. </p>

    1 September 22, 2018
  • Rep. Paul Gosar's own siblings endorse Democratic opponent in scathing ad

    Rep. Paul Gosar's own siblings endorse Democratic opponent in scathing ad

    or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p><p> Six of Rep. Paul Gosar's siblings publicly endorsed his opponent in an advertisement. &nbsp;(Getty Images) </p><p>Six of Rep. Paul Gosar’s siblings have told voters to vote for their brother's Democratic opponent in the upcoming midterm elections. no for their brother in November and endorsed his Democratic opponent in a scathing ad.</p><p>The advertisement, titled “A Family Defends its Honor,” featured Jennifer, Grace, David, Joan, Tim and Gaston, Gosar’s siblings.</p><p>“None of this is pleasant for any of us,” David Gosar said in the advertisement before his other siblings echoed the same thought.</p><p>“To speak up against my brother, it brings sadness to me,” Joan Gosar said.</p><p>“I think my brother has traded a lot of the values we had at our kitchen table,” she said later.</p><p>“I couldn’t be quiet any longer, nor should any of us be,” Grace Gosar said.</p><p>“We gotta stand up for our good name,” David Gosar said. “This is not who we are.”</p><p>“It’s is intervention time and intervention time means that you go to vote and you go to vote Paul out,” Tim Gosar said.</p><p>“This is a matter of right and wrong, not politics,” the letter by Gosar’s siblings stated. “We are aghast that Paul has sunk so low that he now spews the most despicable slander against an 87-year-old man without a shred of proof, and then doesn’t even have the guts or decency to apologize?” &nbsp;</p><p>Gosar has not publicly made a comment regarding the advertisement.</p><p>Kathleen Joyce is a breaking/trending news producer for You can follow her at @Kathleen_Joyce8 on Twitter.</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>

    1 September 22, 2018
  • McDonnell: No borrowing needed to renationalise rail

    McDonnell: No borrowing needed to renationalise rail

    or upfront cost is needed to fund railway renationalisation.</p><p>John McDonnell has said Britain's rail industry can be renationalised without the need to borrow money.</p><p>When asked by Sky News if the return of rail to government ownership would require any further borrowing or upfront cost, the shadow chancellor said: "No, on rail, not at all."</p><p>He said: "We're doing the detailed work as well about how we'll do that.</p><p>"I'm confident we can bring it back into public ownership promptly and then have an efficient service. I'll tell you why - people are demanding it, they've had enough of being ripped off with high fares and a poor service."</p><p>Mr McDonnell described a &#163;176bn estimate on renationalisation by the Centre for Policy Studies as "laughable".</p><p>He added: "I think it has been laughed out of court by any independent commentator. They're pursuing their own particular political agenda."</p><p>If Mr McDonnell had a figure in mind, however, he was not sharing it with his shadow cabinet colleagues.</p><p>On the eve of Labour's annual conference in Liverpool, shadow minister for woman and equalities Dawn Butler said: "I can't give you a precise figure because I'm not the person that's doing all of the number crunching at the moment.</p><p>"But what I can tell you is that every single Labour policy has been costed, our manifesto was costed, no other party has a costed manifesto."</p><p>When pushed on the possible cost of re-nationalisation, however, Ms Butler could only remind voters of what "an absolute mess" the network is.</p><p>She said: "What I can tell you about the railways is that it's an absolute mess.</p><p>"What I can also tell you is that this government pays money - at least &#163;5m a year - to companies who are failing to deliver a good service, and the Labour Party will change all of that and what I can tell you is that John McDonnell is the man for the job to do that."</p><p>A worker tells Sky News how his six-hour daily train journey was &#x27;killing him&#x27;</p><p>She added: "I'm looking forward to his speech where he will outline everything that he would do as chancellor in the Labour government.</p><p>"John loves talking about figures...and crunching figures and I've been in meetings where they've talked about figures."</p><p>Announcing a review into the problems, Mr Grayling said: "My conclusion is that we've got an industry today where decision-making is too fragmented, we need a more joined up industry, we need an industry that moves on from the model set up at the time of privatisation."</p>

    1 September 22, 2018
  • Democrats float more Kavanaugh investigations, impeachment even if he is confirmed

    Democrats float more Kavanaugh investigations, impeachment even if he is confirmed

    or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p><p>Senator Grassley has granted Dr. Ford another day to decide whether to testify before the senate.</p><p>As the political fight over the sexual assault allegation made against Brett Kavanaugh intensifies, Democrats are indicating that -- even if confirmed -- they intend to drag the fight over his Supreme Court nomination past November, raising the possibility of an impeachment push.</p><p>Democrats have been demanding the vote to confirm Kavanaugh be delayed pending a full FBI investigation into the accusation by Christine Blasey Ford that Kavanaugh assaulted her at a party in high school in the 1980s. Kavanaugh has repeatedly denied the allegations and has said he is willing to testify to the Senate Judiciary Committee.</p><p>Republicans on the committee have invited Ford to testify next week, and have said that they will hold a vote to confirm Kavanaugh if she does not. Ford has said she will testify, but only if a list of conditions are met. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, has given Ford a Saturday deadline to say whether she will testify.</p><p>The midterm elections loom over the debate over the timetable of Kavanaugh’s confirmation process. Should Democrats succeed in delaying the confirmation vote past November and pick up seats in the Senate in the midterms, then they will likely have enough votes to block Kavanaugh’s confirmation.</p><p>However, if Republicans confirm Kavanaugh before November, Democrats have indicated that the fight would not be over are raising the prospect of further investigations and even impeachment.</p><p>Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., said that “as soon as Democrats get gavels”, the party will investigate the Kavanaugh allegations even if he is confirmed and sitting on the Supreme Court.</p><p>When pressed as to whether he was saying Democrats would investigate a sitting Supreme Court justice, Whitehouse said he was “confident of that.”</p><p>“And I think we’ll also be investigating why the FBI stood down its background investigation when this came up in this particular background,” he said.</p><p>His stance was backed up by Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif, who said in an interview with Fox News that there could not only be an investigation, but a push for impeachment.</p><p>“If the Republicans rush through a nominee where you have unanswered sexual assault allegations, I can promise you that Democratic senators will be interested in going and looking at those allegations, and if Judge Kavanaugh lied under oath, you could see a judicial impeachment, and that’s not good for anybody, so we should try and avoid that,” he said on “America’s Newsroom.”</p><p>Such a move would require a majority in the House of Representatives, something that a number of pollsters are predicting the Democrats will secure in November.</p><p>“The House Democratic leadership should pledge now that if they win a majority, they will conduct an impeachment investigation, to get to the truth. Doing so today would make clear to the Senate Republicans that if they rush to judgment, in the absence of a full and fair investigation, there will still be an investigation,” he said.</p><p>However, former communication strategist for Justice Neil Gorsuch Ron Bonjean warned that such a push by Democrats could backfire and rile up the conservative base for the midterms.</p><p>I think that would just fire up the conservative base big time and...conservative voters wouldn’t like that and they’d be pretty fired up going into the November elections, that’s for sure,” he said on Fox Business’ “After The Bell.”</p><p>“Look, once he’s on the Supreme Court it’s going to be very difficult to get him out of there and there could be another opening on the court sometime in the near future,” he added. “So I think that’s a lot of happy talk and you’d really have to have conclusive evidence in order to get that, plus you’d have to get that through Congress and I just can’t see that happening.”</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>

    1 September 22, 2018
  •  Ocasio-Cortez appeared on podcast hosted by activist who said 'Jews should get the f--- out of Palestine'

    Ocasio-Cortez appeared on podcast hosted by activist who said 'Jews should get the f--- out of Palestine'

    or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p><p>Democrat socialist candidate struggles to clarify her comment on Israel&#x27;s &#x27;occupation of Palestine.&#x27;</p><p>New York Democratic&nbsp;Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez once appeared on a podcast hosted by a progressive Puerto Rican activist who said Jews “should get the f--- out of Palestine.”</p><p>Ocasio-Cortez, who rose to prominence after defeating top Democrat Joe Crowley in the party’s U.S. House primary in June, got embroiled in a controversy back in July over her views on the Israel-Palestine conflict.</p><p>But before Ocasio-Cortez’s stunning victory against Crowley, which thrust her into the national spotlight, she went on a Spanish-language podcast in May hosted by Rafael Tirado Rivera, a progressive activist in Puerto Rico, who once expressed anti-Semitic views, including that Jewish people should vacate the Middle East, Fox News can reveal.</p><p>The activist, who is also a blogger for Puerto Rico’s largest newspaper El Nuevo D&iacute;a, referred to the disgraced former White House reporter, Helen Thomas, who went on an anti-Semitic rant the same year.</p><p>Among his other guests on the podcast was Julia Salazar, a Democratic Socialist who recently won a New York State Senate Democratic primary, but whose campaign was plagued by allegations that she faked her Jewish and immigrant identity. She’s also a supporter of the boycott movement against Israel and was once denied entry into the country.</p><p>The Ocasio-Cortez campaign didn’t respond to Fox News’ repeated request for a comment and questions whether she was aware of Rivera’s views.</p><p>When asked whether Ocasio-Cortez knew his political views before coming on the podcast, Rivera said, &quot;I'm not sure. Maybe not.&quot;</p><p>The podcast host said he believes “the same thing that I believed 10 years ago,” but offered a different interpretation of the tweets. “Israel should cease the occupation of Palestine. I believe in a two state solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict,” he said.</p><p>&quot;Maybe I should have used a different set of words. Instead of the &lsquo;Jews&rsquo; I should have said, Israel.&quot;</p><p>“Maybe I should have used a different set of words,” he added, noting that during his podcasts with Ocasio-Cortez or Salazar the issue of Israel wasn’t discussed. “Instead of the ‘Jews’ I should have said, Israel.”</p><p>The appearance on the podcast raises concerns about Ocasio-Cortez views towards Israel and the Jewish people, an issue she tried to avoid talking about and changed her talking points depending on the audience.</p><p>She initially raised eyebrows during an appearance on PBS’s &quot;Firing Line&quot; in July after struggling to coherently her explanation her remarks on social media in which she called the Israeli military action confronting protesters trying to breach the Israel-Gaza Strip a “massacre” and that “no state or entity is absolved of mass shootings of protesters.”</p><p>She later asserted, though shortly backtracked in an audience of progressives, that she’s a “firm believer in finding a two-state solution on this issue” but noted that she’s “not the expert at geopolitics on this issue.”</p><p>“This is a conversation I’m sitting down with lots of activists in this movement on and I’m looking forward to engaging in this conversation,” she responded to the question whether she supports a two-state solution during a town hall-style sit-down with Democracy Now, a far-left website.</p><p>This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. &copy;2018 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.</p>

    1 September 22, 2018


Earn free bitcoin